<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An insider’s view of the Capital Initiation Fee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/</link>
	<description>What are your thoughts on the proposed fee?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 9116</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>9116</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Several years ago after the CFO/GM financial debacle the board implemented a policy of requiring three bids on all projects over $1000 and all capital items were approved by the Board late in the prior year to the project being undertaken. It is therefore ludicrous that a no-bid policy was used by Crouch for the Sconti project...he should be impeached!

Sconti is surely going to run at a bigger loss than before, so why not implement a annual food and beverage minimum so we at least get something for our money as well as giving Sconti a healthy base to work from; instead of having to increase our poa monthly fees to cover these anticipated restuarant operating losses!

Yes, The CIF need to be introduced...but do it gradually, beginning with a 1/4% and increasing over the next ten years to the 1%
combined with small annual poa fee increases along with the F&#38;B annual minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago after the CFO/GM financial debacle the board implemented a policy of requiring three bids on all projects over $1000 and all capital items were approved by the Board late in the prior year to the project being undertaken. It is therefore ludicrous that a no-bid policy was used by Crouch for the Sconti project&#8230;he should be impeached!</p>
<p>Sconti is surely going to run at a bigger loss than before, so why not implement a annual food and beverage minimum so we at least get something for our money as well as giving Sconti a healthy base to work from; instead of having to increase our poa monthly fees to cover these anticipated restuarant operating losses!</p>
<p>Yes, The CIF need to be introduced&#8230;but do it gradually, beginning with a 1/4% and increasing over the next ten years to the 1%<br />
combined with small annual poa fee increases along with the F&amp;B annual minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a Resident</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>You will remember that the architects for the new Sconti recommended Integra as the contractor, since they had a working relationship with them.  There was some discussion on the BC bulletin boards about the no-bid contract but, as usual, our board ignored our thoughts and pressed on.  As far as I recall, there was no opposition from our rebuild the Sconti committee.  In my entire business career, I never heard of anything like this going unchallenged.  

As far as recalling or impeaching any board member that goes against the wishes of the property owners, good luck.

As far as challenging the board on assessment increases, good luck again.  Remember that we were told that if we didn't vote for the last amenity package, which included the Sconti debacle, they were going to increase the assessment by a large amount to pay for most of it anyway, whether we liked it or not.  Setting the amount of our monthly assessment falls under the control of the board according to our bylaws.

The biggest problem with challenging the board is that the majority of the residents are like a bunch of sheep and blindly go along with anything.  Combine the apathy of the average resident with the voting control of the developer and you just run up against a brick wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will remember that the architects for the new Sconti recommended Integra as the contractor, since they had a working relationship with them.  There was some discussion on the BC bulletin boards about the no-bid contract but, as usual, our board ignored our thoughts and pressed on.  As far as I recall, there was no opposition from our rebuild the Sconti committee.  In my entire business career, I never heard of anything like this going unchallenged.  </p>
<p>As far as recalling or impeaching any board member that goes against the wishes of the property owners, good luck.</p>
<p>As far as challenging the board on assessment increases, good luck again.  Remember that we were told that if we didn&#8217;t vote for the last amenity package, which included the Sconti debacle, they were going to increase the assessment by a large amount to pay for most of it anyway, whether we liked it or not.  Setting the amount of our monthly assessment falls under the control of the board according to our bylaws.</p>
<p>The biggest problem with challenging the board is that the majority of the residents are like a bunch of sheep and blindly go along with anything.  Combine the apathy of the average resident with the voting control of the developer and you just run up against a brick wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAI</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>CAI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>You said: “We might as well understand that whether we vote for this or not we are going to have it.” and “Remember, we don’t get to vote on the assessments.”

Vote it down, and challenge your Board President to raise the monthly assessments to fund his capital improvements. Remember, you can recall/impeach any Board Director that does against the wishes of the membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said: “We might as well understand that whether we vote for this or not we are going to have it.” and “Remember, we don’t get to vote on the assessments.”</p>
<p>Vote it down, and challenge your Board President to raise the monthly assessments to fund his capital improvements. Remember, you can recall/impeach any Board Director that does against the wishes of the membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TTIN</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>TTIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Duh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Asking</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Asking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>No one could possibly believe that the highly experienced and respected Building Committee consisting of volunteer property owners would manage a no bid project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one could possibly believe that the highly experienced and respected Building Committee consisting of volunteer property owners would manage a no bid project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TTIN</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>TTIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Please help my memory. How could the Sconti Restaurant project have been a NO-BID project?

Once the POA Board’s Capital Initiation Fee is approved, how many more NO-BID Sconti Restaurant type projects will we see and how many more NO-BID Sconti Restaurant type projects can we afford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please help my memory. How could the Sconti Restaurant project have been a NO-BID project?</p>
<p>Once the POA Board’s Capital Initiation Fee is approved, how many more NO-BID Sconti Restaurant type projects will we see and how many more NO-BID Sconti Restaurant type projects can we afford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a Resident</title>
		<link>http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4kfee.com/every-thought-counts/an-insider%e2%80%99s-view-of-the-capital-initiation-fee/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>We might as well understand that whether we vote for this or not we are going to have it.  The only question is do we want to pay for it by the month or do we want to take the chance that we may have to pay it when we sell.  It has been said that the fee would be a detriment to sales.  I also submit that an increase in the monthly assessments would be a negative and would be a hardship on some of our residents.  If the "highly respected insider" thinks it will be a $40 increase, I would stand by for $80+.  Add on top of that the almost certain imposition of a monthly minimum for the new Sconti and you are looking at $300 a month just to wake up in Big Canoe.  Remember, we don't get to vote on the assessments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We might as well understand that whether we vote for this or not we are going to have it.  The only question is do we want to pay for it by the month or do we want to take the chance that we may have to pay it when we sell.  It has been said that the fee would be a detriment to sales.  I also submit that an increase in the monthly assessments would be a negative and would be a hardship on some of our residents.  If the &#8220;highly respected insider&#8221; thinks it will be a $40 increase, I would stand by for $80+.  Add on top of that the almost certain imposition of a monthly minimum for the new Sconti and you are looking at $300 a month just to wake up in Big Canoe.  Remember, we don&#8217;t get to vote on the assessments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

